• aasatru@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think there’s a lot of us who would ideally want to avoid both Microsoft and Google, and now that Bing is having problems it’s more relevant than ever. I don’t really see how the comment is braggy or patronising.

    That said, I’m not comfortable using Brave either. I wish Mozilla or the Internet Archive would launch a search engine. Maybe both in cooperation. Then again, it would require Mozilla to bite the hand that feeds it.

    • ekZepp@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Totally agreed. Hell, I’m even considering a full dive in Linux for the future. Anyone know if is possible to use something like Valve’s Proton to have windows programs run smoothly? (wine is kinda heavy)

      • RmDebArc_5
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        For Games on Epic/Gog/Amazon use Heroic , for everything else/alternatively use Lutris. They set up everything for and apply specific patches with a steam like experience

      • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It depends on what programs and how much do you need them. Some are fine with plain wine, some need more tinkering. There are multiple ways, starting from lutris, through bottles, to steam’s “non-steam game”. But still there are some SW that just won’t work on linux no matter what.

    • Katzastrophe@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      The reason why I interpret the comment as patronizing is how it is formulated as a personal comment, the choice of language, about how their choice of engine is hated, even though the comment they are responding to has not made an insinuation that choosing a search engine not based on the bigger ones is a bad thing (nor has it mentioned Brave at all), as well as how it is not contributing anything to the conversation apart from the information that the writer in question:

      A. Uses Brave

      B. Apparently made the ‘unpopular’ choice to use an independent search engine

      C. Is aware of controversies surrounding Brave’s leadership

      None of this information is a response or even reinterpretation of the prior text, as such it is akin to someone shouting “Well I use Android!!” in the middle of a conversation about how to solve a problem with FaceID

      And about an independent search engine, I would also much prefer more options, but as you have already said, the organizations with the biggest potential are also currently quite unwilling to do anything to solve the situation

      • aasatru@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, fair enough. I read the post more favourably, as a “at least my alternative is still working well for me”, but then also being aware that every time Brave is mentioned someone jumps on and reminds everyone that the CEO is a jerk, so it saves us the time by addressing it right away.

        Both interpretations are valid I guess. :)