• kakes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve seen a lot of people recommending Pop_OS lately. Out of curiosity, what’s the benefit over something like Mint?

    • HeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ll try to offer an answer to both you and @natedog526.

      Pop came heavily recommended for a while because it’s relatively light-weight for a modern desktop, had some fresh UI ideas with its COSMIC plugins for Gnome, and ships with some nice bonuses for gamers like built in Steam and Nvidia setup scripts.

      Unfortunately, it’s become pretty stale lately. I still use it daily on my main desktop, but lately it’s becoming harder and harder to keep from hopping to something new. A few pain points include Pop shipping older version of some important software like the Kernel, Wine, and Mesa, persistsant audio bugs like the other user mentioned, and basically no support for Wayland at the moment.

      A lot of these are because System76 has been heavily focused working on its COSMIC desktop, which should function a full standalone desktop environment instead of Gnome with duct tape. It’s looking forward to seeing it which has so far kept me from switching, but with no release date and other distros offering what Pop offers, it’s harder and harder to stay put.

    • Omnifarious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Curious about this too. I was gonna spend some time trying some different distros. Both mint and PopOs are on my list.