On Tuesday, voters in Crook County passed measure 7-86, which asked voters if they support negotiations to move the Oregon/Idaho border to include Crook County in Idaho.  The measure is passing with 53% of the vote, and makes Crook County the 13th county in eastern Oregon to pass a Greater Idaho measure.

  • PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What do they want that Idaho can provide that Oregon can’t? Some people have to flee entire states over abortion laws for lifesaving medical procedures and they’re told stuff like “well if you don’t like it just move”.

    • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The ability to be more open about being white supremacist garbage. Idaho is a dumpster fire - the state is suffering shortages of medical professionals because of the GQP.

    • brotkel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      Imagine scraping the money together to move from Idaho to Oregon to protect your health and bodily autonomy, then 300 of your neighbors get together and decide, nope, you’re still in Idaho.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I appreciate that. And this is a great example to whip out when those idiots say shit like that. Obviously moving isn’t an option for most people and for those whom it is, they likely have.

      What exactly they want isn’t important, just that it’s very much the opposite of how the state is being run. Admittedly some of the demands fall under crazy bullshit, but the central issue is agency. Politically speaking they have very little, and this is the one lever left to them to pull.

      Imagine you’re on a train of trolleys, and every time it comes to a point where a direction could be chosen, every car votes and consistently the ones at the back are out voted by the other cars. You can’t get off and buy another ticket. But you might be able to detach the cars.

      Furthermore, reorganization like this should be done far more frequently than it’s being done. Why shouldn’t we allow disparate peoples of similar opinions vote together and govern each other? Why are we locked in to the lines on a map, the last major change of which happened in 1867. Since then, the borders have remained relatively unchanged.

      Not only should they, a group of people I likely hold only one fundamental belief in common with, not be afforded some self governance?

      • uhmbah@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Imagine you’re on a train of trolleys, and every time it comes to a point where a direction could be chosen, every car votes and consistently the ones at the back are out voted by the other cars. You can’t get off and buy another ticket. But you might be able to detach the cars.

        So, you’re describing the 47% who do not want to partition?

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Admittedly some of the demands fall under crazy bullshit, but the central issue is agency.

        It’s like saying “it’s not about slavery, it’s about states rights.”