It’s been a little bit, but I’m back! As usual, not my blog, just a good community share. Authors are on Mastodon at @[email protected]

  • poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    English
    622 days ago

    That Stirling PDF is surprisingly useful.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 days ago

      I’ve had it running for a few months, I don’t use it that often but it’s been super handy when I need it.

  • TekhneOP
    link
    English
    323 days ago

    The WinAmp maybe sorta open-sourcing is interesting. I’ve never used it (aside from downloading it to get MilkDrop working in Foobar2000).

    • calm.like.a.bomb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      823 days ago

      They are not open sourcing anything. They just want people to contribute. The license is not open in any good way fit the users.

      • BlueÆther
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        What licence are they using? Do you know something everyone else does not?

        Just because Llama Group want to control what goes into FreeLlama? Just like every other open source with a leadership?

        Winamp will remain the owner of the software and will decide on the innovations made in the official version

        If I release project qwtop as open source I still retain ownership of my code and make the decisions about what makes it into the main release; how is this different so far, when we haven’t seen the licence?

        <edit: see post below>