• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Unfortunately for nature we’re like cockroaches. You can kill the majority of humans with a big enough asteroid, but actually wiping us out while persevering vertebrate life is a tall order. Hell it was a tall order before we even got out of the neolithic.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Humanity survives adversity well” is not not something I would think of as “unfortunate.”

      • BigFatNips
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unfortunately for nature but depending on your perspective it’s unfortunate for humans as well

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I suppose from the perspective of misanthropes it’s unfortunate, but I discount the opinions of misanthropes.

          How is it unfortunate for nature? We’re part of nature. In the long term humanity is nature’s best mechanism for enduring long term, since eventually Earth is going to become uninhabitable due to the Sun’s aging process.

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            We’re part of nature.

            This is the whole crux of the comic that I see so many people, even in this thread, misunderstanding. Nature isn’t some “out there” thing, or even something we “emerged” from. There is no emerging! This is it. Me on my phone eating a second veggie dog while scrolling on my phone is part of nature. You reading it - also nature.

            • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yes, well that’s tautological, isn’t it? Nature is everything, so everything is nature. What’s the point of having the word if it doesn’t carry any meaning?

                • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  We already have plenty. The universe. Reality. Existence. Creation. The world, as you said. What does the word nature bring to the table?

                  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    One more word for the poets. Also, it can mean like just trees and green things, and shit, just like the universe can mean galaxies and black holes, and shit. But also mean everything everywhere including us.

    • explodicle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Fun fact: the Oxygen Catastrophe wasn’t a one-time event. It happened repeatedly in waves until life finally evolved a way to use the Oxygen.

      When humans emerge from their bunkers, they’ll quickly rediscover nuclear weapons and greenhouse pollution.

    • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Are we? We haven’t been around that long enough relative to the planet. We won’t be here in another billion years.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nothing will be here in a billion years. Setting aside the fact that no species lasts that long anyway, Earth only has a few hundred million years of habitability left, if “nature” has its way. The sun’s steadily brightening as it ages and tectonic processes are causing changes in Earth’s atmosphere that will eventually prevent photosynthesis from operating, at which point Earth become the domain of a few hardy strains of bacteria again.

        That is, unless humans (or our very distant descendants) decide to do some meddling to keep Earth alive. There’s various ways to do that, from solar shields reducing the solar influx to moving Earth’s orbit farther out to stripping material from the Sun itself to moderate its output.

        “Gaia” has no foresight. She will sorely miss humanity’s technological descendants once the planet gets in that situation, there’s nothing she can do about it herself.

        • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There were things here a billion years ago. There will be things a billion years from now.

          Humanity is a blip that will be forgotten.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            There were things here a billion years ago. There will be things a billion years from now.

            No, there really won’t be. The Sun is getting brighter as it ages, in just a few hundred million years Earth will either cook to death or every single molecule of carbon dioxide will have to be taken out of the atmosphere to counteract the effect. Either way photosynthesis ends at that point.

            Unless something technological intervenes.

            Also, a billion years ago the only “things” that were around were bacteria. The Cambrian explosion didn’t happen until 530 million years ago.

            Humanity is a blip that will be forgotten.

            Unless our descendants are still around, which they could easily be. Humanity doesn’t need Earth to survive long-term. The reverse is not true.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        We won’t be here in another billion years.

        I don’t know about you, but I sure won’t be