• Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 months ago

    I like this kind of pictures. Someone should come up with a name for them. Here’s few similar kind of ones:

    • Sockenklaus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Funny, I am getting uncomfortable looking at the picture. It looks so unnatural. 😬

    • DrWorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      The Netherlands. I couldn’t tell you which canal but the river boat cruises go down this.

        • Shadow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          6 months ago

          No way. It’s ai.

          The lane markers make no sense. The lines are too perfect in the clouds and flowers.

          • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I doubt its ai - I don’t think AI would get that guardrail that consistent. It has that little hole in the exact same place over every bar, even the distant ones. Although, why is the guardrail double sided when there’s no road on the other side?

            Nevermind, I found it on google maps.

            • Shou@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              6 months ago

              The other side already has trees. The trees also have a secondary function besides more trees. They plant them equadistant, except for near a crossing. There the trees get closer and vloser together, giving the illusion that you’re driving too fast and encouraging people to slow down regaerdless of the roadsigns.

              • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                No, I was wondering about the side of the guardrail facing the canal. If you look closely, there is a metal strip on that side too, which is not something I’ve seen here in the US. Maybe it’s just there to add extra strength? I guess traditional guardrails rely a lot on the guardrail deforming and acting like a net, which might cause a problem when the edge of the canal is so near, IDK

                • Shou@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I think those are all valid reasons. The ground isn’t rock either, but soft too. So perhaps it will move a lot? Then again, wouldn’t the angle a car makes hitting it determine how much it bends? If a car goes relatively straight, it shouldn’t need to bend much.

            • Bob@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Although, why is the guardrail double sided when there’s no road on the other side?

              The other side is a shipping canal that gets a lot of traffic, so I suppose it counts as a “lane of traffic”.

              • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                As a Dutch person, nah. Double sided guardrails are the norm in here. It’s relatively uncommon to find a guard rail that’s single sided.

          • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            This looks like an average road in the Netherlands. The only thing that seems odd is the lack of a bike lane, but otherwise this is pretty mundane over there.

            • Shadow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              The lane markers on the road seem completely arbitrarily placed. Neither the length or spacing are consistent.

              • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                NL guy here.

                So a centre marking tells me it’s an 80 km/h road, and the side markings, together with the trees off to the side, aim to optically narrow the road, making drivers more conscious of their speed. This is part of the Dutch universally applied standards of traffic calming.

                If there were only markings on the side, usually a little inwards from the roadside, it’d be a 60 km/h road. This would be even more pronounced if the space outside of those lines had red asphalt. In such a case, it’s sometimes allowed, or even expected, for cyclists to cycle in the main roadway.

                • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  This, and also because it is an unlit road I think?. You don’t want to get offroad in the soft ground here during the night. The side lines help mark where the road ends, since they will “light up” at night by the cars lights

              • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                That’s an astute observation and you’re probably right. Doesn’t rule out someone f’ing up IRL but it makes the whole thing less believable for sure.

            • Cort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Another poster in this thread found the Google Street view and it looks like they’ve added one recently.

              • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                On this location though, the bike lane is off to the side. It’s an 80 km/h road, that’s too fast for on-street cycling.

    • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      As a Dutch guy, I just thought: Hey, a random rural street. These kind of views all over the place in the Netherlands.

      • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You just made me even more curious about the Netherlands. I wanna see it all now.

        I can’t believe I need a fucking visa just to see it

  • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    As a Dutch guy, it is hilarious to read how many people thought this was fake. I’ve seen these types of roads so many times. Very common in The Netherlands. Discussions made me appreciate the work all our tree carers do to maintain safe roads.

    Still, a beautiful and smart picture.

  • Lucidlethargy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m guessing this is photoshopped heavily, but it’s very nice to look at!

        • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          I would really love to hear your explanation why you thought the sky gave it away XD

          That’s like the most regular looking sky ever XD

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ofcourse it’s photoshopped. There are virtually no digital photographers who release unedited photos. There’s always adjustments done to exposure, shadows/highlights, contrast, white balance etc.

          However if you’re implying that it’s obvious to you that this has been faked then I’d love to hear your reasoning as I’m quite experienced photo editor myself and nothing stands out to me and I feel like my 15+ years of experience has trained me to spot such things.

          The only thing I’m noticing is the difference in the color of the sky behind the branches but that can probably be explained by the fact that this was likely taken with a smartphone and is due to it combining multiple exposures for higer dynamic range, commonly known as HDR.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Please explain more of your reasoning, since you were seemingly “proven” wrong here. Do you still maintain that the image isn’t real? Or did you mean it was simply processed in post?