Security services say spate of fires and infrastructure attacks could be part of systemic attempt by Russia to destabilise continent


Security services around Europe are on alert to a potential new weapon of Russia’s war – arson and sabotage – after a spate of mystery fires and attacks on infrastructure in the Baltics, Germany and the UK.

When a fire broke out in Ikea in Vilnius in Lithuania this month, few passed any remarks until the Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, suggested it could have been the work of a foreign saboteur.

    • massive_bereavement@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Wow, I definitely didn’t expect that “Factual Reporting” would be “Mixed”, however going through the list, it shows several instances where they misunderstood either a scientific paper or misrepresented some fact.
      That said, I had before in some cases seen articles about AI being either false, misunderstanding the facts, or just parroting some CEO. I attributed it to AI being something relatively “new” to mainstream media, but this is pretty much eye opening.

      I like their “long read” articles though, but I guess it’s time to find a new main everyday paper for me…

      • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Uh, other journalists have called it The Gruniard for years because it has so many mistakes 😂

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          That name comes from typesetting errors rather than factual mistakes (and is also a holdover from the pre-computer era when spell checking wasnt a thing)

      • DolphinMath@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think this bit sums up the reason for the rating pretty well. Not sure if I completely agree, but it makes sense to me.

        The Guardian has failed several fact checks, they also produce an incredible amount of content; therefore, most stories are accurate, but the reader must beware, and hence why we assign them a Mixed rating for factual reporting.