• BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why did we talk so much about James Webb and I’m only discovering about this telescope now ?

    A telescope designed for dark energy !

    • paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least part of it is that NASA is good at marketing. They make cool shit and hype up the public so we all know how cool it is too. Soon they’ll be launching a NASA+ streaming service that’s completely free. All their video and live content in one place. They’re genuinely one of the coolest public entities I know about, and part of why I know about them is because they’re so good at marketing their projects to the lay public.

      • Lepsea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “+” in it’s name but it’s free, what kind of sorcery is this

        • tal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was, in fact, the regular, no “+” NASA that required the tax dollars.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why did we talk so much about James Webb

      At least on /r/europe on Reddit, I think because it was being launched by a European rocket from a European spaceport, so there was a lot of discussion about Arianne. The scope was extremely expensive, so rebuilding it probably wouldn’t be an option, and Arianne 5 was a particularly reliable launch platform.

      Amusingly, this new Euclid scope is the mirror opposite of JWST: a principally-European scope launched by an American rocket from an American spaceport.