• Chais
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gravity? I wouldn’t consider keeping me down guidance.

    • influence1123@psychedelia.inkOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ha, yeah if you wanted to get 100% materialistic about it, it would be forces, plural. Although sometimes I like thinking, like if you zoomed all the way out and watched the whole universe sped up it would look like just one big explosion starting from the big bang (we are still exploding outward just the expansion is more slow). So was it one force or multiple that started the big bang or does the word “force” lose meaning that far back. So I guess whatever that force was might not still be acting on us directly but the effects of it are throughout the whole equation. If that makes sense, might be a stretch haha.

      • voxl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The force? Consciousness (imo! :))

        • influence1123@psychedelia.inkOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Could be for sure. In Hinduism, from what I understand, before the big bang there was one being that was the whole universe in one place, called Brahman. Then Brahman split itself into the multiplicities of everything and we are all just pieces of that one being. Maybe, eventually, after all the stars die out, we will be whole again. It’s a cool idea I think.

          • voxl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I heard of the Brahman before, thanks for providing additional info. Time to read up!

            And yeah, once there’s no relative light or darkness anymore, there just is. And that’s maybe where the “big bang” re-occurs. Or something.

            I’ve had some… ahem… “visions” that showed me this cycle. Consciousness can’t say something is something without there being nothing. Light CAN’T exist without dark, and vice versa. So if there’s only “dark”, wtf is dark? The absence of light, right? But there’s no concept of light! So let there be light.

            • influence1123@psychedelia.inkOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly, exactly. I’d recommend reading The Uppanishads translated by Eknath Easwaran for more about the Brahman idea. Thats how I learned about it.