Viewers are divided over whether the film should have shown Japanese victims of the weapon created by physicist Robert Oppenheimer. Experts say it’s complicated.

  • atzanteol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What about the victims of the bomb

    That’s not… Whataboutism. Whataboutism is a tu quoque style counter-argument.

    This article is just people discussing other things that could be in the film.

    The “whatabout what the Japanese did?” is whataboutism. It’s a cheap diversionary tactic used by defensive people when a discussion makes them uncomfortable.

    • ormr@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whataboutism is a stupid concept in itself as this term is now hurled at anyone who wants to make a comparison or add some context to an argument. So I’d say using the word “whataboutism” isn’t helpful.

      • atzanteol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. Whataboutism is lazy misdirection and nothing more. It’s not “providing context” it’s changing the subject. It’s weak and used by people who have no argument or defense for their position. “You too” is a logical fallacy for a reason.