- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The Texas Supreme Court on Friday rejected a closely watched challenge to the state’s restrictive abortion ban, ruling against a group of women who had serious pregnancy complications and became the first in the U.S. to testify in court about being denied abortions since Roe v. Wade was overturned.
In a unanimous ruling, the all-Republican court upheld the Texas law that opponents say is too vague when it comes to when medically necessary exceptions are allowed. The same issue was at the center of a separate lawsuit brought last year by Kate Cox, a mother of two from Dallas, who sought court permission to obtain an abortion after her fetus developed a fatal condition during a pregnancy that resulted in multiple trips to an emergency room.
Abortion rights activists have struggled to stem the tide of restrictions that have taken effect in most Republican-led states since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 overturned Roe vs Wade, which for nearly 50 years had affirmed the constitutional right to an abortion.
The court said the law’s exceptions, as written, are broad enough and that doctors would be misinterpreting the law if they declined to perform an abortion when the mother’s life is in danger.
Hmmmm
It’s hard for me to choose the more likely theory:
(1) That these judges are so deluded that they think this is reasonable; or (2) That these judges are making the argument that it’s possible to get an abortion in bad faith because that means justifies the end of keeping a law on the books that prevents effectively all abortions.
Stupid or malicious. I trend towards malicious these days. Too much info to be that stupid that often.
Or they’re interpreting the law as written without context so they can get home by lunch, just like every other originalist.
They think abortion is murder for religious reasons and are doing everything in their power to discourage them from happening.
That’s kinda the point - Texas permits a life-saving abortion, but is super vague as to what counts as “life-saving” and if it’s not life-saving **enough ** then comes the extreme punishment.
This is excessive. Way too much. Cruel and unusual punishment is against the US constitution.
Seriously, just consider the following from bad evil theocratic authoritarian Saudi Arabia:
Expat doctor, nurse arrested in Saudi Arabia over unsafe abortions
Holy shitsnacks does that ever put America’s fascist back-slide in focus.
The doctor has to do it just right. Otherwise straight to jail - Texas Supreme Court, probably
If they mess up the game Operation buzzer goes off and state troopers immediately bust in.
Unless they suspect there is any sort of danger inside. In which case they mill around outside the OR and prevent anyone else from entering.
I would joke that they’d arrest the patient too, but…
It permits it then almost immediately punishes the Dr who saved a life. Just conservative things