• Euphorazine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    If the juror is allowed to keep the money after the trial if they report it, just means we will have open bribery of jurors.

    “Yes, I got this $100,000 cashier check to vote guilty, so I’m going to vote not guilty to keep the $100,000”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      You let them keep it as a reward for doing the right thing and reporting, but you also replace them in the jury.

      • RvTV95XBeo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        So you can replace a juror of your choice for a bag of cash?

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          Apparently you can do that already since this juror was removed. Also it sounds expensive with very little reward

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Not to mention it involves directly implicating yourself in a new crime (or several, since it would be both bribery as well as jury tampering). And it would be more evidence of guilt.