• WldFyre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    5 months ago

    How on earth are trying to both sides this lmfao

    Learn to read

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      A leftist that points out inequality inherent in the system? What a strange thing to encounter on Lemmy. I’m positively flummoxed as to how this came about.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you ask anyone from .ml, I’m not even a leftist. I am pretty dead set against Donald, whereas they (and Bibi) want Donald elected.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Jill Stein is not going to be president. Your assertion is in bad faith or ignorance.

                  • barsquid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    No, she won’t. And hopefully I voted for viable candidates down the sheet because I’ll have lost that vote.

                    She’ll be president if enough voters to overwhelm the EC’s red shift vote for her. Which will not happen with FPTP. There are 46 examples of this not happening over a couple hundred of years. Including her, specifically, in 2012 and 2016.

                • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  you literally accused people who said they want Jill Stein to win of lying and actually wanting another candidate to win. that’s bad faith.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Leftists carrying water for fascists? Definitely not a strange thing to encounter both on Lemmy and in history.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It isn’t a “both sides” thing, it is a class thing. The wealthy never face consequences unless they personally perform some heinous act, and even then it isn’t guaranteed.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I sympathize with being sick of bothsidesers, but I don’t think that’s what I’m doing here. The justice system is unfair as it is. Dems aren’t doing enough but Repubs want to make it even worse. If youths came out to vote in every election we wouldn’t be stuck with these two choices, but there is very clearly just one sane choice.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If youths came out to vote in every election

        They did, and their candidate lost anyway. Too many olds spread across too many districts.

        Maybe if you can convince a few hundred thousand Youngs to move to Wyoming…

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Every election. The parties cannot count on the youth vote. They both seem to be acting like they don’t care what youths want. I am assuming a correlation there. Unfortunately it’s correlating in both directions.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The parties cannot count on the youth vote.

            The youth vote isn’t a specific set of people. Its a continuous cohort of new voters entering the pool. And the parties are deeply wedded to the youth vote, in so far as they need to get their hooks in early in order to guarantee consistent turnout in later generations. Big investments in social media by partisan groups - from TPUSA to Joe Rogan sponsors - are predicated on winning over young people to right wing ideology. And Republicans consistently have some of the youngest elected party members because they aggressively recruit young people into leadership

            What can’t be counted on is the liberal party to engage with younger voting cohorts. You don’t see Democrats engaging with youth activist movements. You don’t see Democrats courting the college vote. You don’t see Democrats attempting to seat ideological 20-year-olds in city councils or state legislatures and build up the back bench. You don’t see the national party investing in professional party workers under the age of 30. Liberalism is the party of stoggie old dinosaurs telling their grandkids to shut up and vote for them, then getting mad when they only win 60-70% of the youth vote and still lose.

            When liberal democrats burn out in their 30s and 40s, because they’ve been lied to and betrayed over and over again, all we get from the liberal party is “The other guys are worse, though!” As though that shit was ever a winning strategy.

    • n3m37h
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Maybe you shoukd, Please re read his last paragraph