• ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    But with a reason, I’m sure. There’s no reason for the everyday consumer to need one, other than Microsoft wanting more control.

    • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Data encryption and decryption without entering a password is a pretty darn good reason.

      • ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but does a grandmother’s Solitaire & Facebook PC really need quick encrypting and decrypting? Anyone not dealing with sensitive info doesn’t need one.

          • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            How would at-rest encryption make it less likely that your computer joins a botnet, or more likely that you’d notice if it did?

        • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no downside to having it. There’s many downsides to not having it. This seems pretty cut and dry to me.

    • kingthrillgore@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      TPM actually provides some useful components to isolate encryption outside of Ring 0, which is a trust win. But any technology must be weighted against its power to oppress.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      yes, the reason is to securely store cryptographic keys. even your own. It comes preloaded with microsoft ones usually, but you’re free to delete them and install your own

    • knight@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the way everything is moving. Hardware protected keys can be very useful but it’s a double edged sword. It’s more secure but also allows companies to lock consumers out.

      We need rules that say when this tech is used the consumer still gets full control over it. Like what Google does with their Pixel phones and the Titan chip. Not what Apple does.

      • Hexarei@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sure you’ll be ok sending me your social security number, home address, bank login details, credit card number, a copy of all the files on your hard drive…

        I mean, you deserve no privacy right?