• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2126 days ago

    Massive subsidies? Selling the cars at a loss? Using conflict minerals? Slave labor? All of the above?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      626 days ago

      Conflict materials can be avoided with LFP batteries that are basically only made in China.

    • @IrateAnteater
      link
      826 days ago

      The automakers less so. They don’t particularly care what powers the cars people buy, so long as people buy them. They were in the process of pivoting to electric platforms, but, being as terminally stupid as they are, a lot of that has been put on hold while they try to figure out why their current $100,000 offerings aren’t selling by the millions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        426 days ago

        Automakers care about how much R&D they have to invest and the impact on the quarterly profits. ICEs are dirt cheap in that regard, and it took the federal government bribing them to do so.

  • Hildegarde
    link
    fedilink
    1026 days ago

    Two paragraphs that don’t answer the question in the title, and a request for donations. Useless.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    625 days ago

    Putting aside politics, macroeconomics and questions about build quality, one unavoidable answer is…because they want to. The US should get more ambitious.

  • Beaver
    link
    fedilink
    English
    124 days ago

    The west needs to turn on the heat for legacy automakers management

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -126 days ago

    Because they give zero shits about passenger safety, pedestrian safety, worker rights, customer rights, are owned by the government, and steal all their tech instead of putting in the work themselves?

    • @spidermanchild
      link
      525 days ago

      I thought you were talking about GM for a second. Tell us more about how US truck/SUVs are so great for pedestrian safety, the child labor at the Hyundai plant in the south, the relentless spyware and horrible data privacy practices, the US auto bailouts, and their “innovation”. I have no love for Chinese EVs, but the US domestic market has plenty of problems on their own.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -525 days ago

        You do realize American have sensors that will you if theres a kid there, right? Just because some European urbanite who has never driven a car thinks hoods are too tall doesnt mean he knows what hes talking about.

        • Beaver
          link
          fedilink
          English
          324 days ago

          I’m Canadian and I’m against cars in general. Active transport and public transit are better than evs for the future.

          The cars the west is buildings are too obsolete, big and wasteful.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -324 days ago

            Says the guy who posted at like 2 am in Canada, but 2 pm in China.

            Methinks you’re not canadian.

            Also active transport? Thats a biochem thing, it has nothing to do with public transit.

            • @threelonmusketeers
              link
              English
              323 days ago

              2 am in Canada

              Ah yes, Canada, famous for having a single time zone.

                • @threelonmusketeers
                  link
                  English
                  323 days ago

                  1 am to 5 am

                  Huh, 14:00 in China is 06:00 UTC, which is 23:00 Pacific time. 23:00 seems like a perfectly reasonable time to be browsing Lemmy.

            • Beaver
              link
              fedilink
              English
              123 days ago

              Yeah because Canada doesn’t have night owls