• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re posting this on lemmy.world. The owner of this instance, the biggest new instance, is literally building out a business of instance hosting.

    If this goes well, and his business grows, it will have chief executives.

    • average650@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      But there will be other instances. If this one does something stupid, then we go to another one and miss almost nothing.

      • daguito81@waveform.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a bit like saying “Yeah so we don’t care what reddit does, because you can always go somewhere else”

        It’s the biggest instance, so it’s where most of the community and content would be etc etc. Just like what happened with beehaw could happen to world as well. This is only true for a mature decentralized federated ecosystem with a lot of redundant communities so that if one goes down you can easily consume the same content from a different instence. Is that the case now? I would say no, so it’s even less leader-proof.

        • average650@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lemmy is perfectly fine with beehaw defederating.

          There is certainly the risk of a single instance dominating. But even now there are a few significant instances and losing beehaw didn’t ruin anything.

    • lightrush@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It depends what he’s the CEO of. For example whether it’s a non-profit, a for-profit, a co-op, etc. It also depends on the licensing of the data. I don’t think this last bit has been tackled by Lemmy yet. Wikipedia has done it quite successfully. If the data is licensed under CC for example, and backups are published, then migration of the whole instance becomes possible like it is for Wikipedia. That would be one hell of a disincentive to fuck around, even if the company is for-profit. Non-profit co-op plus CC-licensed data is probably the most resistant.