• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I call it genocide all the time [demeaning pet name omitted].

    Then call it a genocide right now. Say that the actions of Netanyahu that Biden supports are a genocide.

    Biden could stop his support tomorrow that’s not going to change congress.

    Congress didn’t force Biden to sell Netanyahu weapons for genocide. Congress didn’t force him to claim there was no genocide. Congress didn’t force him to go to bat for Netanyahu at the UN for so long.

    Oh and go check my post history I call genocide all the time.

    I checked. Three whole times in the past month, and two of those were denying that Biden supports Netanyahu’s genocide. We have different metrics for “all the time.”

    I said you were behaving like a juvenile / adolescent. Not a child. Which you are even here. If you aren’t actually that young and just behaving like you are. That’s a you problem kiddo.

    Condescension is what centrists use as their replacement for defensible positions.

    • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Condescension is what centrists use as their replacement for defensible positions.

      Then you must be a centrist by your own weird metric because all you ever do is be condescending. And no, before you go accusing me, it’s not a lie. Look at your own post history.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Biden should stop supporting genocide” is a defensible position. I notice that my interlocutor ceased when challenged to call Netanyahu’s actions the genocide they are.

        Can you call it the genocide it is?

            • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Why would I answer a question coming from someone who isn’t arguing in good faith? And I can give a rats ass about what you keep “noted”, champ.

                • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  And out come the demeaning pet names.

                  And here comes the victimization.

                  You refuse to call it a genocide. Does your employer prohibit you from doing so?

                  🙄

                  Go back and read my previous reply.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    And here comes the victimization.

                    I’m accurately describing what you’re doing. If you don’t want me to point out that you’re using demeaning pet names, don’t use them.

                    Anyway, I’m out. I’m not going to argue with a genocide denier.