alphanerd4@lemmy.worldM to US Authoritarianism@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-25 months agoThat’ll be Why the Median is Barely Over 40lemmy.worldimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up1583arrow-down1154file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1429arrow-down1imageThat’ll be Why the Median is Barely Over 40lemmy.worldalphanerd4@lemmy.worldM to US Authoritarianism@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-25 months agomessage-square105fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarebratorange@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·5 months agoBut I think this is only about wages right? It doesn’t take into account growth in net worth based on shares, does it?
minus-squareTelodzrum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months ago“Income” is understood to mean wages in measurements like this.
minus-squarebratorange@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoNot sure about this. However if this was the case, income would be a pretty useless term in terms of describing financial inequality, as a lot of wealth gained would be excluded by this definition.
But I think this is only about wages right? It doesn’t take into account growth in net worth based on shares, does it?
“Income” is understood to mean wages in measurements like this.
Not sure about this. However if this was the case, income would be a pretty useless term in terms of describing financial inequality, as a lot of wealth gained would be excluded by this definition.