Tech experts are starting to doubt that ChatGPT and A.I. ‘hallucinations’ will ever go away: ‘This isn’t fixable’::Experts are starting to doubt it, and even OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is a bit stumped.

  • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Idk, an ai delivering low quality results for free is a lot more cash money than paying someone an almost living wage to perform a job with better results. I think corporations won’t care and the only barrier will be whether or not the job in question involves enough physical labor to be performed by an ai or not.

    • dub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      They already do this. With chat bots and phone trees. This is just a slightly better version. Nothing new

      • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, but that’s the point right? This will grow and more jobs will be obsolete because of the amount of work ai can generate. It won’t take over every job. I think most people will use AI as a tool at the individual level, but companies will use it to gut many departments. Now they would just need one editor to review 20 articles instead of 20 people to write said articles.

    • knotthatone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI isn’t free. Right now, an LLM takes a not-insignificant hardware investment to run and a lot of manual human labor to train. And there’s a whole lot of unknown and untested legal liability.

      Smaller more purpose-driven generative AIs are cheaper, but the total cost picture is still a bit hazy. It’s not always going to be cheaper than hiring humans. Not at the moment, anyway.

      • bric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Compared to human work though, AI is basically free. I’ve been using the GPT3.5-turbo API in a custom app making calls dozens of times a day for a month now and I’ve been charged like 10 cents. Even minimum wage humans cost tens of thousands of dollars* per year*, thats a pretty high price that will be easy to undercut.

        Yes, training costs are expensive, hardware is expensive, but those are one time costs. Once trained, a model can be used trillions of times for pennies, the same can’t be said of humans

        • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can bet your ass chat gpt won’t be that cheap for long though. They’re still developing it and using people as cheap beta testers.

        • knotthatone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s reasonable to assume that AI API pricing is artificially low right now. Very low.

          There are big open questions around whether training an AI on copyrighted materials is infringement and who exactly should be paid for that.

          It’s the core of the writer/actor strikes, Reddit API drama, etc.