With less than two weeks until the first presidential debate of the 2024 election cycle, CNN has released additional details on the parameters agreed upon by the Trump and Biden campaigns.
We’ve got 4 years to work on that. We have to hammer the primaries and the mid terms and get more people active in trying to get STAR voting or ranked choice, or pretty much anything except FPTP.
Canvas for your dog catcher and every other piddly position that gets elected. Don’t wait to fall in love. Vote for the furthest left that can win any given election and keep pushing left.
I’m strongly considering running for my state House or Senate seat, since neither is contested in my district. I’ll need help canvassing for signatures, but hopefully it gets people to notice third parties.
My platform is basically:
any alternative to FPTP (prefer STAR or approval) - we tried RCV, and that didn’t seem to go anywhere, but at least people have heard of it
anti-war - includes foreign aid to aggressors like Israel
pro-immigration - I like the idea of citizens vouching for immigrants, and being responsible for any crimes they commit instead of the current quota system
anti-censorship in any form
pro-privacy
strict fiscal conservative - no unfunded liabilities, no deficits
anti-monopolies
I have opinions on the rest of the common issues, but I’m willing to budge on most of them to get a nomination.
I’m registered Libertarian, but I’m willing to run on any ticket that’ll help me get signatures. I don’t expect (or even want) to win, I just hate uncontested seats.
If you’re in a similar area, I highly recommend you do likewise.
receive at least 15% in four separate national polls of registered or likely voters that meet CNN’s standards for reporting
Ugh, this nonsense again? How are people supposed to get there without the media coverage something like a national debate would provide?
I like the rest of the rules, but I did notice they didn’t mention Oliver Chase, the Libertarian Party candidate. I doubt he’d get to the 15% mark, but he meets the rest of the requirements.
I’d love to see a 5-way debate. More than that seems a bit much, but for an early debate, it can really give voters an interesting set of alternative perspectives, and the two major party candidates would likely be pushed into answering some uncomfortable (read: informative for voters) questions.
Ugh, needs more third parties
We’ve got 4 years to work on that. We have to hammer the primaries and the mid terms and get more people active in trying to get STAR voting or ranked choice, or pretty much anything except FPTP.
Canvas for your dog catcher and every other piddly position that gets elected. Don’t wait to fall in love. Vote for the furthest left that can win any given election and keep pushing left.
I’m strongly considering running for my state House or Senate seat, since neither is contested in my district. I’ll need help canvassing for signatures, but hopefully it gets people to notice third parties.
My platform is basically:
I have opinions on the rest of the common issues, but I’m willing to budge on most of them to get a nomination.
I’m registered Libertarian, but I’m willing to run on any ticket that’ll help me get signatures. I don’t expect (or even want) to win, I just hate uncontested seats.
If you’re in a similar area, I highly recommend you do likewise.
Where is it you’ve tried RCV? We have it at the state level in Maine and it seems to me to work pretty well.
Utah allows cities to opt-in to RCV for nonpartisan positions.
Ugh, this nonsense again? How are people supposed to get there without the media coverage something like a national debate would provide?
I like the rest of the rules, but I did notice they didn’t mention Oliver Chase, the Libertarian Party candidate. I doubt he’d get to the 15% mark, but he meets the rest of the requirements.
I’d love to see a 5-way debate. More than that seems a bit much, but for an early debate, it can really give voters an interesting set of alternative perspectives, and the two major party candidates would likely be pushed into answering some uncomfortable (read: informative for voters) questions.
I didn’t expect much, yet I’m still disappointed.