• efstajas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sorry but “they could slip in a chip that enabled a wavelength their satellites can access” is ridiculous. Sending a real-time video stream to a satellite would require a large and very power hungry transmitter on the drone. It’d be super obvious.

    People won’t do that at scale.

    It’d take only one person to recognize a sudden large traffic spike caused by the app and post about it online to ruin such a setup. As soon as it’s confirmed by a few more people, it’d immediately be a major news story. And it’s not like it’s particularly hard to spot unusual traffic; especially on a phone where the OS monitors per-app data usage both on mobile and WiFi.

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Starlink used ~100W at launch, and it’s coming to phones. They could also use cell towers directly. Or sharing data in a swarm with nearby units and sending on whichever has access. Or they wait to upload until they’re on wifi when nobody cares about data usage.

      There are a lot of theoretical options here. The point isn’t to look at a single option, but to consider what China may consider doing once they have eliminated competition. Exfiltrating data is one option, but there are others as well.

      The solution isn’t to ban DJI drones, but to ensure there’s enough competition that they don’t have a monopoly.