Indiana and Kentucky lose access in the coming weeks.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7812 days ago

    There was talk at one point of them releasing the viewing habits of politicians based on metrics they had collected….i wish they would have

      • Vox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1412 days ago

        Never, they’ll do what they always do, make laws in a fashion that only applies to the lawmakers

  • Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1811 days ago

    And two more states are soon to have a massive uptick in VPN usage.

  • HEXN3T
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1611 days ago

    Golly, if only there was a way to appear as if I were in a different location… a network of tunnels that I could travel through… like a very fast mole…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    the fact that they can comfortably afford to just dump multiple entire states’ worth of customers just shows how mountainous the piles of cash they’re raking in are

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    The laws generally require adults to upload some form of government ID

    Absolutely insane, KYC for looking at pornography

  • Black_Mald_Futures [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 days ago

    I love how they have some preachy bullshit telling me to vote unlike all the other websites which either 1) let you verify or 2) are ignoring the law

  • radiofreeval [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1112 days ago

    If TraffickingHub is just pulling out over age verification laws, said laws should be federal. We need to put a stop to the industrialized abuse of women through porn, and this seems like a good way of doing this.

    • toastboy79
      link
      fedilink
      511 days ago

      so we’re just going to ignore the porn done by female presenting creators that they themselves do because they want and like to?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        So because some women do it for themselves it makes it okay for the ones that are abused? is that the argument you’re presenting here?
        be clear.

        • toastboy79
          link
          fedilink
          411 days ago

          Absolutely not. Clear enough?

          What I’m suggesting is that just because some people are abused doesn’t mean we need to dismantle the whole damn thing. We need to fix the problems present while acknowledging and encouraging the positives in it.

            • toastboy79
              link
              fedilink
              210 days ago

              No worries, I enjoy that people seen to actually talk and discuss here so I’m glad to add to it

    • @Scubus
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      What laws will it take to get you to oull out? We need to out a stop to you