• macrocephalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you watch ads instead of paying a modest fee to remove them then you’re a clown. Companies do need to make money for the services they provide, I just disagree with the amount.

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Modest?” $14 a month? $5 would be modest. I literally pay less for whole as streaming services.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’d probably pay $5, and I’d certainly pay $2-3. But I don’t watch enough to justify $10+/month.

      • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        If you watch enough youtube per month to see an hour of ads and you can’t block ads for some reason, you may actually be losing time/money by not paying the subscription. That said, there are ad blockers for almost every platform so it shouldn’t be too difficult to find one that works.

          • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            That was my comment about the amount that should be charged. I’ll happily pay $5/mo, but not $15. I’m happy to pay for services, just not the amount that many want to charge.

    • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      They make enough off of all my data they collect. I’m not paying them a cent for anything and I’m not watching a single ad. If you want to watch ads for shareholders, you are most definitely a clown.