• roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    201
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Activists don’t need the personal information of people they disagree with. Terrorists do, charge them accordingly.

    • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      5 months ago

      Terrorist-a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aim

      Hmmm… that DOES sound a bit familiar…

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Terrorism needs target to be an indefinite number of persons.

        If target is one particular person, this is regular crime.

        EDIT: or persons. Serial killers are serial killers, not terrorists.

            • UlfKirsten@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              No it doesn’t. But it’s worded in a way that speakers of certain articledeprived languages would have trouble understanding it.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      5 months ago

      Activists don’t need the personal information of people they disagree with.

      Speak for yourself. If you believe that intelligence work is beneath you, the other side has already won.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          5 months ago

          That is not what they’re saying.

          This is what they said:

          Activists don’t need the personal information of people they disagree with. Terrorists do,

          This is not a case of somebody saying something smart but just wording it terribly. It’s no different than idots who spout “only cowards wear masks!” It’s something only somebody that has no familiarity with actual activism - ie, no familiarity with the actual stakes and risks involved in real activism work - would say.

          • Mark@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            What you are alluding to is no longer activism and should be called what it is, terrorism. You are reframing the issue much as a neo Nazi might.

            • masquenox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              5 months ago

              What you are alluding to is no longer activism

              The libs on here are really good at demonstrating that they know absolutely nothing about activism in any shape, way or form whatsoever - but are still willing to feign expertise on the matter.

              I guess heckling antifa from the sidelines back in 2016 gave you lots of practice in that, eh?