• Beryl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That there are such wild variations in price between countries shows how little that subscription is correlated to any actual costs.

    At best subscribers in richest countries are subsidizing poorer ones, but most probably, Google is just trying to maximize the amount of money they can extract from everyone’s pocket. The repeated seemingly random price hikes seem to confirm this hypothesis. It’s just the MBAs enforcing terminal stage capitalism and ruining everything that is good.

    • darreninthenet@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not approving of any corporate behaviours here, but extracting the maximum price a market will bear has been the basis of pricing and supply/demand since such concepts existed which is at least 250 years.

      • Beryl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t disagree but it seems to me it’s going crescendo, with de facto monopolies running the show and buying anything that could be an obstacle, be it other companies or policymakers.

        • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          So if it makes sense to charge people in India 1/4 the people in the US why can’t we pretend we are in India? People travel to other continents for healthcare.

          • BigFatNips
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Novel take, I agree though I’m sure it will b controversial.

          • darreninthenet@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I suppose the argument would be, yes that’s fine as long as you only use it in India…? 🤷🏻‍♂️

            Again, not saying I agree but it’s hard to make a comparison like that I think.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, there’s no real costs, because in this case it’s a cost of “lost opportunity” in advertising.

      As a rich westerner, your eyeballs are worth more than some rickshaw driver in deepest darkest India, because you have more money to fritter away on nonsense.

      Never understood how the third world pricing logic holds up for things like video games, since the hardware to play them costs pretty much the same no matter where you are.

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Never understood how the third world pricing logic holds up for things like video games, since the hardware to play them costs pretty much the same no matter where you are.

        logistics and taxes also play a role