return2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 8 个月前Will the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up125arrow-down1external-linkWill the Debate This Week Be ‘Rah-Rah’ or ‘Ruh-Roh?’www.nytimes.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml · 8 个月前message-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareatzanteollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-28 个月前Or “ho hum.” Who doesn’t know the candidates yet and thinks they’ll learn anything about them?
minus-squareFlaminGoku@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 个月前If it even happens. Trump is looking for every reason to not attend.
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·8 个月前I, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
minus-squareatzanteollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 个月前There are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·8 个月前There are more than 2 candidates.
Or “ho hum.”
Who doesn’t know the candidates yet and thinks they’ll learn anything about them?
If it even happens. Trump is looking for every reason to not attend.
I, for one, haven’t seen a few of the US candidates at a debate.
There are two candidates. No, the others are not viable. Yes I know that’s unfair. Yes voting for them is basically not voting and potentially helps another candidate you “hate more” to win instead.
There are more than 2 candidates.
Good luck with that.