• Mountaineer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 个月前

    This didn’t happen, Wikileaks vetted information before releasing it for exactly this reason.

    Name one person.

    • ganksy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 个月前

      Must have been a ton of informants he was protecting in the RNC email dump he chose not to release.

    • IIRC a password providing access to some of the full, unredacted documents was leaked, so despite Wikileaks vetting the documents some names did still get out. It was fairly quickly scrubbed and its believed that nobody was harmed in the end, but it got pretty close.

      • BeeDemocracy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 个月前

        I have to correct you there. The full unredacted cables are still online on various sites. Including cryptome. They have been online this entire time. Yes, no-one was harmed, but not because they put the cat back in the bag (you can’t). Once other sites had published it, WikiLeaks republished the full trove as a risk-mitigation measure so that the compromised names could quickly make themselves aware that their name was out there. WL also contacted the State Department to try and warn them of the risk. There is footage of this.

        The US spent tons of money trying to find anyone who’d been harmed by Manning’s leaks but found no-one.

        WikiLeaks had been drip-feeding big stories based on the cables. The compromise of the encryption key to the full unredacted archive by Luke Harding and David Leigh of the Guardian put a stop to this unfortunately. They stupidly published the encryption key in their book. Once people found the encrypted file online it didn’t take long to put 2 and 2 together.

        • That’s true, but Wikileaks does share at least some of the blame for making the encrypted documents accessible. They’re not immune to leaks themselves and should handle these incredibly sensitive documents accordingly. In this case, they failed to do so and an external party triggered a leak. Wikileaks should probably have deleted the documents alltogether.