• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    205 days ago

    Does that thing have a big turntable under there somewhere? Because from the photo, it looks like it can shoot in exactly or almost exactly the direction the rails happen to be pointing, and if you need to shoot somewhere more than two or three degrees to either side, you’re SOL…

    • @sanpedropeddler
      link
      English
      165 days ago

      It doesn’t look like it. They did sometimes use a kind of turntable to allow regular cannons to easily change direction, but I don’t think the same was done with these.

      • raoul
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 days ago

        Maybe it’s because of the recoil?

        Having the canon alligned with the track allows it to move with the recoil while having it slightly angled may make it derail 🤷‍♂️

    • Davel23
      link
      fedilink
      125 days ago

      I’m guessing it was used almost exclusively to destroy trains.

    • @pacmondo
      link
      English
      95 days ago

      We’re huntin trains today, Billy.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    145 days ago

    Back when a solid plank was all I took to protect you from rifle fire. Or does the encasing serve some other purpose, perhaps?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      245 days ago

      It also serves as a bike ramp. The Confederate soldiers were well known for their love of BMX tricks.

    • @sanpedropeddler
      link
      English
      125 days ago

      Wood still wasn’t strong enough to sustain a lot of fire even from those rifles. The confederacy just didn’t have enough iron.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 days ago

        That’s some pretty thick wood at a good angle. Maybe there’s a mythbusters, but I’d expect it could protect against small arms fire of the day.

        • @sanpedropeddler
          link
          English
          35 days ago

          Wood is definitely better than nothing, but I don’t really see a situation in which this thing would need protection against small arms anyway. Unless something has already gone horribly wrong, those small arms are a significant distance from your artillery. At that range, they are already effectively worthless because their lack of rifling makes them horribly inaccurate.

          If I had to guess, you would mainly be worried about union sharpshooters (maybe) and artillery. At that point the only real advantage of the wood is the obstruction of sight.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            35 days ago

            The fourth guy from the right looks so confident; oh yeah, you think you got what it takes? Bring it!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    95 days ago

    Kinda looks like one of those turtle tanks (blyatmobiles) that are showing up now in the Russian-Ukrainian War.