• flambonkscious
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, sure - that’s still China trying to undercut and ensure the US remains reliant on them long term…

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      No that’s just the US not being competitive because stock buy backs and layoffs are easier than building good cheap cars.

      • flambonkscious
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        …or both. Think about it, if what you’ve said is completely true (I don’t disagree, BTW), why would they bother subsidising?

        They’re trying to ring fence the market. That the US is helping then is only vaguely related

        • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          But it’s not both. How can you produce something for cheaper with less subsidies unless your just better at it.

          It’s like saying the winner of a race had an unfair advantage even after giving their opponent a head start.