Is there a WiFi camera with an app for viewing when away from home, that has decent privacy? Plug and play would be nice. Limited time to do major setup as in 2 hours tops. Cost is fine nothing into 4 digits. Recording not neccesary. No storage is needed. Simple live viewing is all.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 months ago

    It always seems simplest to do this stuff with raspberry pi cameras or cheap webcams, and wired networks if feasible. Then use ffmpeg and icecast to stream through a VPS. Anything made as a consumer product is likely a shambles of crap software and security holes.

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I dont have a vps though currently. I do have a webcam. No idea how to set it up to or viewing and to run 24/7. I can port forward though and am pretty network/software literate.

          • solrize@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s a trade off between video quality and bandwidth but you can set the ffmpeg parameters to the bandwidth you want, more or less. If you have 2mbits up you can do ok. Motion detection can help if it’s for security and not much is happening most of the time.

            • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              10 is the low upload for me. So this might work just fine. Not sure on setup but I definitely want to get it done soon as possible. I just don’t have much time between work trips. So I need a rapid solution.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you currently have an IP camera setup, add Tailscale to your network with the Subnet Routing feature enabled.

        You can then access that camera from anywhere.

        Optionally also enable the Funnel feature, and you won’t even need the Tailscale client.

  • refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    When you say “app” do you mean something that will let you view remotely through a residential NAT connection with no port forwarding or hole punching? Because 99.9% of those options are inherently not private.

    If you only need the camera itself to have a local feed i.e. you already have some kind of VPN/tunnel/etc. into your home network, then something like a cheap Amcrest works fine and does not require Internet access for the camera itself.

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Out of town viewing through tailscale or something similar. The feed needs to remain private from the LAN/WIFI. Only access is through me from outside the network.

    • thefool
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thanks for mentioning Wyze… looks awesome.

      I ended up with a shitty Arlo set that I overpaid for, and the worst part is that they no longer sell the station where you can save video to the local network, meaning I’d have to pay for a subscription

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      And then setup an rtsp aggregator (there’s some foss ones that are lightweight all the way up to fully functional nvr like shinobi) and make it local access only and vpn in

  • barcaxavi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Do you have any smart home setup as of now? Asking because if you have a Hue Bridge or Home assistant running at homefor example, that could narrow the results.

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      No nothing. I’ve been busy so setting up home assistant hasn’t happened. I have a server PC but haven’t done anything with it yet. Currently dont have the time. I just need to pop in install live feed and pop out the next day. So something live only and quick is what I need. I’m familiar with tailscale.

  • Citizen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    i personally stay away of any “cloud” connection like hik connect…

    By cloud connection I mean that the device connects to the provider’s cloud (vpn) and you(end user) connect to the provider to view your OWN video footage.

    In terms of privacy this is disaster because the provider can view/process as in AI all your video footage in real time. Further the provider can track the shit out of us and do many other nasty things…

    Hope it helps!

  • electromage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    As far as easy, commercially available stuff I like UniFi. You can set custom recording schedules, or never record. Or only record motion. You can also set privacy zones which are blacked out and not visible or recorded.

    You do need one of their consoles or NVRs to manage them though, and they aren’t super cheap.

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Reolink and one other I can’t remember seem to be the most consistently recommended hardware (actual security companies rather than cheap Chinese hardware rebranded by hundreds of drop shipping start ups). They only need internet access for the initial activation, and can be connected to home assistant or ftp server. I created an account with an alias email, then blocked its internet access from the router. It works fine on LAN and via tailscale.

    https://reolink.com/product/e1-zoom/

    NOTE: these wifi cams are not a “security” system. They’re for basic monitoring and scaring your cat.

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I will check this out. I need it today. So I’m not sure if this is possible. Its very short notice. I had an unexpected trip.

  • nsfwpls@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    You could install OctoPi and use that camera feed. It’s a little overkill compared to motioneyeOS since it’s originally meant for monitoring and controlling 3D printers, but I’ve had better luck getting OctoPi to set up a camera feed than motioneyeOS, which was abandoned by the developer years ago.

    You could install it on the NUC, plug in a camera, and it should just work. Then use whatever remote access method you want, i.e. tailscale, port forwarding, VPN, etc.