Conservative activists in Georgia and other states are using a new software tool as part of a broader effort to scrub voters from the rolls.

They’re asking election administrators to use their data to purge voter registrations, which means names could be removed in a less public process than a formal voter challenge. The strategy could mean electors won’t be summoned in advance to defend their voting rights and the identities of those seeking to purge voters might not be routinely public.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240702113635/https://apnews.com/article/georgia-voter-removal-software-eagleai-266ead9198da7d54421798e8a1577d26

  • _haha_oh_wow_English
    10·
    6 months ago

    That would be a hell of a trick when over 60% of the country doesn’t agree.

      • nocturne@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        2·
        6 months ago

        And with the way education is going in this country, it will not be long before they can convince everyone that 34 is less than 28.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgEnglish
      141·
      6 months ago

      60% of the population disagrees, yes. However…

      The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures

      So, 34 red state legislatures can propose an amendment. To be ratified, it requires 3/4 of the states (38 out of 50) to ratify it.

      For either of those steps, I’m not sure if the citizens of those states have any say in the matter or if the legislatures can do it all themselves (plus or minus any veto from the governor of those states or legislative overrides of those).

      So, they need 34 states to propose an amendment and 38 to pass it. As some else in this thread said, they already have 28.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgEnglish
          13·
          6 months ago

          Definitely. But there’s also disproportionate representation at play.

          Let’s say there’s a mass exodus from the shittiest of shithole states leaving only, say, 100 people. For sake of argument, that’s sufficient for the state to continue existing and with a state government.

          That 100 person state still gets two US Senators and (at minimum) one House rep (technically, it retains as many reps as it had as of the last census up until the next census in 2030). It also qualifies to be one of the required 34/38 states to call for a constitutional convention as well as vote to ratify the proposed amendment.

          So, the takeaway is that all elections matter. Get out and vote every opportunity, and vote for sane people who aren’t going to pull this kind of crap.

          if voting wasn’t this important, why do you think they’re working so hard to disenfranchise so many people?

      • dhork@lemmy.worldEnglish
        9·
        6 months ago

        Conventions aren’t just for amendments. They can be a vehicle to start over from scratch, just like they did in 1789. Then the only barrier we have is that final 3/4 threshold…

        … But do you really think it will stop if they hold the thing, come out with a new document dominated by red state ideas, and it fails to get enacted? They will view the 13+ states that are not going along as traitors, and our newly minted President-King will do something rash to get the new document approved.

        If a constitutional convention gets called, I fear we’ll end up with a 2-for-1 deal, and those MAGA bastards will finish the job that Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee started.