Florida bans AP psychology, College Board says, because of lessons on gender identity and sexual orientation, which violate state rules.

  • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s both. I’ve been called a Trump supporter, a “Jew shill”, and a liberal snowflake, all in the same week. I find it fascinating, talking to very opinionated people. Doesn’t matter what it is. Even if I think they’re right about whatever that topic is, I find that people become incredibly hostile if you ask them something they don’t have an answer for, if it might challenge their beliefs.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The problem is you’re approaching this from a place of complete ignorance on what the science actually is. You’re saying “both sides have science,” but that’s fundamentally not true. One side has the entire fields of medicine and psychology, which contain some internal disagreement on issues around the margins, but overwhelmingly agree on basic concepts. The other side latches on to single studies or portions of conclusions of studies taken out of context that confirm their existing beliefs. If there were science behind the Republican position on these issues, you’d be able to cite it here, so please do

    • LemmyLefty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find that the people who purport to an academic view of fights over human rights tend to be those whose rights are not (now) in question, and that they find more entertainment in the emotions at play than in empathizing with those who feel said emotions makes me question their willingness or ability to change their own stance.

      Neutrality is a starting point. Where you choose to go from there is an expression of your character.