• Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 个月前

    Generally in the United States you have an opportunity to cross-examine all evidence, these cameras are not calibrated regularly and generally not kept up (arguably they are so low budget they need no upkeep), so they become un-admissable when you challenge them, which many people win because the camera was last calibrated and cleaned when it was installed.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      We have that opportunity too. You can opt to not accept the proposed (automated) settlement, and challenge the citation itself. People have done that and won. However, administrative fees for that are often higher that the proposed settlement so it’s only worth it in special cases.

      • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 个月前

        Can’t speak to other countries but that generally offends American Courts, it comes off as retaliatory for exercising your American rights and has been struck down numerous times in various venues. One of the most scared rights in America is to be heard and reheard in front of a court of competent jurisdiction, we all have our day in court.