• magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Whether or not its “invalid” isn’t the point. Those are the accepted terms by most people, especially those in the industry. The point of language is to communicate ideas.

    When most people say “free software”, they’re talking about software that’s free as in freedom. Using it otherwise just causes unnecessary confusion.

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      When most people say “free software”, they’re talking about software that’s free as in freedom. Using it otherwise just causes unnecessary confusion.

      If by “most people” you mean the general population, you are absolutely wrong. Hell, even software devs (at least in the US) would fight with you unless they themselves are interested in FOSS.

      When the average Joe pays nothing for an item that they want, regardless of whether that item can be modified, they will say that the item is free. To your average Joe, software is yet another item.

      • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah that’s why I threw “especially those in industry”.

        Either way if you’re not writing software then yeah sorry your input matters less on the language we use to describe it.

        I’m not gonna walk over to a doctors office and start arguing that the language they use is wrong because it doesn’t line up with what I know as a layperson.

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s an accepted use.

      There’s a reason they disambiguate every time, and it’s because “free beer” is exactly as correct.

      Correcting someone who isn’t wrong always make you the asshole.