It pops up as paywalled in Chrome, but not Firefox. Not on archive.org, so here’s a tl;dr:

"Two private polls conducted in a swing New York House district and reviewed by POLITICO — one in September and another in March — found former President Donald Trump leading Biden there by 1 point, a virtual tie. And public polls over the last four months found Biden’s lead had winnowed to just 8 points across New York — an unusually narrow gap in a state where Democrats outnumber Republicans 2 to 1.

“We’re still acting like this is a one-party state, which for pretty much 20, 25 years it has been,” Democratic Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine said. “I truly believe we’re a battleground state now.”

A Biden lead of 8 points in a state he carried by 23 in 2020 is a huge loss of support.

Current polling:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/new-york/

  • noneya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    To those downvoting this comment (and every other comment critical of Biden):

    What is the percentage of loss you are willing to accept before you call for Biden’s removal from the ticket?

    Is it 10%? 20%? 80%?

    When will you be willing to consider a different candidate? Surely there’s a number…I’d just like to know what it is.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      The problem is, as I’ve noted previously, the time to replace him was last September. It’s too late at this point.

      Here are the scenarios:

      1. Biden runs and loses, which is the current track.

      2. DNC forces Biden out for Harris, who loses, because people hate her more than Biden.

      3. DNC forces both Biden and Harris out for a new candidate, who loses, because voters feel they had no role in choosing the replacement.

      The only way I see a “D” win here is for Biden to die in office, Harris steps up and gets a sympathy vote.

      • noneya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Respectfully disagree. It took France a couple of weeks to form the New Popular Front, which just won HUGE. Why wouldn’t it be possible to form a similar coalition in the US?

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          There is zero chance that the DNC steps aside for a third party…

          And there’s like a 0.0001% chance they pick anyone except Kamala if Biden is replaced.

          I think she has a better shot than Joe. Some people think the other way.

          If the DNC allowed it, there is plenty of time for a primary. The DNC just isn’t going to do that. Because the incoming Dem president gets to set the DNC leadership and party platform. If a Republican wins, the party usually votes to maintain leadership.

          So for current leadership when the choices are:

          1. Biden or Kamala win
          2. Trump wins
          3. Someone voters want wins

          The only way they lose power is #3. If trump wins, they keep power and 2028 is the same shit show we’ve been living thru.

          Understanding doesn’t mean I agree with it.

          But that’s where we’re at right now. Biden and the DNC are willing to burn the country down for personal power. And regardless of if he wins or loses, the people in charge of the DNC stay in charge of it.

          • noneya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m not talking about forming a new party. I mean forming a coalition.

            I’m just tired of hearing “it’s too late” when it’s quite obviously not too late.

              • noneya@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                OMG, you’re making this more difficult than it needs to be.

                Ok…coalesce around a new candidate. Find someone fucking else. There’s still time and France just proved it. How can you say it’s too late?

                • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Because any new candidate has 118 days to rise to prominenance and win the election, that’s not enough time.

                  • noneya@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    118 days

                    Oddly specific number. Care to share the law in which this figure is stated?

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      There is no percentage that will sway them. They would rather have Trump than admit they’re capable of being wrong.

      • noneya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s starting to seem that way. Really sad and disappointing how hypocritical people are.

        We were supposed to be the party of integrity; the party who stood for what was right; the party who was unafraid to challenge the status quo. Now, it just seems like we are two shitty sides of the same fucking awful coin.

        Watching the American experiment fail is truly the most heartbreaking thing I’ve ever experienced in my life.