One longtime Senate Democrat recently recalled a conversation he had at this week's North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in Washington, D.C. that revealed how American allies are reacting to the current frenzied news cycle regarding President Joe Biden's viability as a candidate.In an in...
Not generally, but it’s only ever happened to one president before and they hid Reagan away and put Nancy in charge once he got too bad.
In this case it’s public and obvious, which it never was with Ronnie.
Oh THAT’S your angle? You’re about the minimizing of the most powerful human in the world being cognitively diminished no matter which one wins?
It’s not like the commander in chief would ever need to be able to communicate or anything 🙄
Nah, his gish gallop of ridiculous lies is old hat. It’s expected. It’s boring.
It’s not that he’s old. It’s that his brain isn’t functioning properly anymore. Last I checked, being able to think and communicate clearly while projecting an image of competence were THE most important parts of the job.
Unlike for example Bernie, who’s slightly older, but showing absolutely no signs of cognitive decline, Biden is no longer qualified for the job he’s reapplying for. That Trump is obviously even worse is irrelevant to that.
As Jon Oliver said: the standard to beat CANNOT be as low as Trump. Trump is the definition of NO standards.
Did you watch the entire debate, or just the highlights? I don’t think acknowledging he was completely cogent for 99.9% of it is minimizing anything, but that’s not part of the narrative the media are pushing.
I don’t particularly like Biden, but my main concern at this point is keeping Trump out by any means necessary. Sacking the incumbent four months prior to the election is a dangerous gamble, especially so if he isn’t willing to step down himself.
In any case, it looks like it’s going to have to happen now regardless, but I sincerely believe it’s more because of the media’s irresponsible coverage than any actual substantive issue.