I’m trying to get a gauge of what people here are interested in.

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Big fan of long-form science fiction. Bladerunner 2049 is fantastic, as is Stalker by Tarkovsky.

    Tarkovsky in particular has brilliant works.

    • eightpix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sci Fi top 6 ‐ focusing a bit on the soft sci-fi

      1. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) dir: Stanley Kubrick

      2. Arrival (2016) dir: Denis Villeneuve

      3. Her (2013) dir: Spike Jonze

      4. BladeRunner (1982) dir: Ridley Scott

      5. Children of Men (2006) dir: Alfonso Cuarón

      6. GATTACA (1997) dir: Andrew Niccol

      • d13@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you haven’t seen it, Ex Machina (2014) fits the vibe of your list. It’s one of my favorites.

        • eightpix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’ve seen it. I enjoyed it very much.

          I picked Her for my A.I. entry because it was so much simpler, more understated, and close to our everyday experiences.

          I also skipped Primer (2004) because I steered clear of time travel.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I can recognize 2001 as being incredible and inspiring for its time, but it doesn’t hold up very well. By modern standards, it is painfully boring and tedious.

        • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Disagree, I think 2001 is perfect. Yes it’s slow, but that’s intentional, it’s part of the feeling of the film.

          Modern standards don’t really apply, because I don’t think anyone nowadays is trying to do what Kubrick was, nor (obviously) was he trying to live up to any standards of future movie making.

          Each to their own of course, but wanted to put a friendly counterpoint :-)

          • eightpix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            2001 is timeless.

            Political intrigue, technological advancement, piercing the unknown, all drawn on the backdrop of an innocuous, normal exploration mission.

            Until things go awry.

            As directly inspired by 2001, I’d count a bunch of modern classics: Children of Men (2006), Sunshine (2007), Passengers (2016), the Expanse (TV series), and more.

            What Kubrick did write the story with Arthur C. Clarke, slow the pace to reflect the long-haul nature of the mission — let alone the slow pace of human development — and focus on the sheer scale of progress needed to achieve such exploration. He also ensured that the conflict was truly tangible and high-stakes. Simple and human in its genesis, but devastating in its execution. Then, confronting ET intelligence as truly “other.”

            Perfect.

    • eightpix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Actually, I’m wondering now what you thought of the 2002 Solaris remake. I’ve not seen the Tarkovsky version, and I’m assuming you have. Of his other films, I’ve heard of Stalker. Recommend any others specifically?

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Haven’t seen either of Solaris, but the big deal here is that the US version loses a lot of Tarkovsky’s specific, drawn out and contemplative styling in favor of a more active and dynamic version for the US.

        Andrei Rublev and Mirror are standouts, to my knowledge, and are generally seen as better than Solaris but not quite as great as Stalker.