• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Performance benchmarks for mobile parts are meaningless without power consumption data.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      True. If this is around a 30 watt tdp, it would have amazing power consumption numbers (for reference, they were comparing it to a 1070 max q, which could have a max tdp of 115 watts).

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          4 months ago

          Even then, that is pretty impressive with a cpu and gpu together (sorry, haven’t looked at the newer cpu tdps in a bit, was thinking older mobile chips).

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I have an older 680m in my laptop and it performs pretty well with a combined package power of under 45 watts. Usually the last 10% comes at like 50% increased power consumption so that may be where the 35-65 watt range comes from, but the final performance shouldn’t be too far off.

    • Audacious
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I always calculate performance /( TDP * price) when looking at new relevant PC parts, something most reviewers don’t bother doing.