• --Cincinnatus--@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    130
    ·
    edit-2
    5 个月前

    Jack Smith wasn’t appointed by the President and wasn’t confirmed by the Senate. That’s the reason for the dismissal. It was obviously just a partisan hit job

    • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      5 个月前

      Where the fuck in the constitution is there a stipulation that a prosecutor in the executive branch has to be confirmed by the senate? You people can’t keep your shit straight with your “unitary executive” wet dream. Worthless traitor garbage.

      • braindefragger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 个月前

        No you don’t understand. Commenter was told these talking points. There’s no “thinking” happening here. 🐑

    • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      5 个月前

      Special prosecutors have been allowed through legal cases for 30 years now at least. They are settled law. Hell, they used one on Hunter Biden recently I believe.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        5 个月前

        The fact that something deemed unconditional has happened a lot before doesn’t justify it as constitutional. Only text can do that.

        • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 个月前

          Congress passed a law deligating the power to the AG. There was a congressional vote to put that law into place. Congress doesn’t need to vote on every police officer that the president hires do they?