• Evu@mtgzone.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    So they shortened “enters the battlefield” to “enters” but didn’t do the same for “leaves the battlefield”? That underscores how weird this wording change is.

    • Silverchase
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The official justification is that the only place cards enter to is the battlefield, so it’s unambiguous. Cards can still leave from a variety of places, so it’s still necessary to say from where.

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think I figured it out. The battlefield is the only zone a permanent can enter into. In other zones it is put in, like graveyard or command zone. They can’t go with leaves alone because it would imply a trigger in the graveyard or exile.

      So this way it actually makes sense. Still sounds fucking stupid tho.

    • Silverchase
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, kind of. It’s because of the “return” effect being a separate triggered ability, which has some odd rules interactions.

      It’s a bit before my time, but I think Banishing Light was created specifically to be a more accurately-worded Oblivion Ring that avoids rules quirks.

      • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        So that’s the difference. It’s kind of the same way the wheel from modern horizons 3 having a separate clause made it broken.