cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/859623

Since 2020, Next Generation Internet (NGI) programmes, part of European Commission’s Horizon programme, fund free software in Europe using a cascade funding mechanism. This year, according to the Horizon Europe working draft detailing funding programmes for 2025, we notice that Next Generation Internet is not mentioned any more as part of Cluster 4.

[…]

While the USA, China or Russia deploy huge public and private resources to develop software and infrastructure that massively capture private consumer data, the EU can’t afford this renunciation. Free and open source software, as supported by NGI since 2020, is by design the opposite of potential vectors for foreign interference. It lets us keep our data local and favors a community-wide economy and know-how, while allowing an international collaboration. This is all the more essential in the current geopolitical context: the challenge of technological sovereignty is central, and free software allows addressing it while acting for peace and sovereignty in the digital world as a whole.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just some days I would wish that EU wouldn’t have to work alone in making the world a better place.

    Seems like everyone, especially Russia and US right now, are trying to do the exact opposite.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      4 months ago

      It doesn’t work to make anything a better place. It just acts defensively where its opponents have advantage and offensively where they have disadvantage.

      Let’s please remember that the EU is bigger in population and potential than either of these two, but weaker in assets. It’s interested in stalling them in key areas, not actively engaging.

      Returning to better places, the EU is working with pretty disgusting regimes.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think we talk about the same thing then.

        GDPR, Digital Market Act, the USB C law for e-waste and regulations like those are the one I’m talking about.

        And then also what this article is about.

          • themurphy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think I get what you mean, when I only named consumer rights against companies and eco friendly laws?

            Can you specify why it’s bad and who the EU is trying to hurt with this?

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              25
              ·
              4 months ago

              Work on your reading comprehension if you intend to pretend to act in good faith like this

          • best_username_ever
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            They don’t protect my privacy because they have a disadvantage though. That’s not at all what the GDPR is all about. Same for the other laws.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              GDPR etc. are the tip of the iceberg when it comes to EU regulations. Plenty of them apply to stuff where the EU is world-leading, also very far-reaching ones. Compared to REACH, GDPR is quite low-impact indeed.

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s not the relation I meant. Rather having a long-term strategy because, compared to Russia and USA and anyone around, time works for the EU.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  If you can’t see how that’s a (small) puzzle piece of a long-term strategy then I can’t help you either.

                  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    This comment doesn’t seem to make sense both combined with mine and with your previous one, but OK!

                    I don’t think I see less than many people here.