• abbenm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Ivermectin has small but severe incidences of side effects, and the dosage at which it would need to be administered as a covid prophylatic make those more likely, and the totality of studies is mixed.

    The website you cite with 75 studies does not recommend ivermectin as a replacement for vaccines.

    The news article you cite, contrary to your claims, does not claim a 4th booster is “ineffective.” It says that it does indeed defend but not as effectively against omicron.

    Your interpretation is “the narrative” is just a handful of vague claims being interpreted in bad faith, and ignores underlying context: there was a period when it was possible to keep the pandemic under control, and that opportunity slipped away due to a combination of antivax misinformation and public resistance, which is not the same thing as a vaccine not working.

    You’re an antivax crank.