• morgan423@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    The $15.50 guy would have some people lined up. It’d be appealing for people who needed a job short term, quickly, and wanted the decreased competition for it.

    Not a bunch of people would be lined up there, but it wouldn’t be no one.

    • Captain_Nipples@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Depends on the job. We have labor positions that pay $18, but demand a little bit of physical labor. It’s hard to fill those positions.

      10 years ago, people would line up for that job for less than $10/hr and the work was much, much harder. Something has definitely changed

      When I started with the company in 09, people were coming in during outages and trying to outperform each other so they’d be hired on full-time. But the economy was ass back then and it was hard to find a full-time job at my age

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 years ago

        Expenses have changed.

        My apartment I paid $700/month for in 2011 is now over $2000/month.

        When ex to expenses outpace wages more than 2:1, eventually it catches up and people can’t afford to live where the work is.

        • Captain_Nipples@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Makes sense. Same in my area. I wonder if this isn’t all going to blow up and cause another recession soon. Seems like this shit can’t be like this for long.