• Zipitydew
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 个月前

    The entire fucking point of the primary process is to pick the candidate more people said they’d vote for in the general.

    Ignoring the results of that process is what got us Hillary. Who the DNC also assumed would get the most votes. Just like you’re making assumptions now without any supporting reasons other than opinion and hope.

      • Zipitydew
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 个月前

        Which is exactly what I’m getting at. She won the popular vote. By a lot. Dropped the ball in swing states. Lost the election because you win through the EC.

        A ticket popular on the coasts and only popular there is gambling with losing the EC again. AOC isn’t nearly as popular as people here are suggesting. Harris will have tough odds to beat Trump.

        A Harris/AOC ticket isn’t going to do well in swing states. It only plays well to states that are already solid blue.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      The primary is for engaged people to decide which candidate they want, not to pick the candidate that is best for the general necessarily. That’s always one of the talking points candidates need to appeal to, but it isn’t the only factor, or even always a major factor. For example, Trump was selected for the Republicans in 2016, and he almost certainly wasn’t the “best” candidate.