• sentientity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Appeasing them is dangerous. I see this line of thinking a lot, but it has never led the dems to victory and it has repeatedly compromised our own values and degraded trust in the party. We cannot and should not cater to the worst people in the room at the expense of our own morals. It is wrong, but it is also a losing strategy.

    • TheDannysaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Right… We become beholden to the laggards of social progress because we think we can’t win without them, and we alienate and stagnate the progress of those doing the most.

    • merc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Appeasing them could be dangerous depending on how it’s done, and to what extent. But, what if the appeasement is merely choosing a man for her VP? Maybe that’s all it will take.

      We cannot and should not cater to the worst people in the room

      The worst people in the room are voting for Trump. This is catering to people in the room who are on the fence and might need a nudge. You can stick to your principles and ignore them, or you can consider their opinions. Ignoring them might mean losing the presidential race. And if you lose, then the purity of your agenda and message is meaningless because the other side wins. And, in this election, the other side winning might mean permanent damage to the whole democratic process.