• @Zipitydew
        link
        102 months ago

        Good for you. I tag accounts like that instead so I can keep tabs on whatever latest talking points are getting distributed.

          • @Zipitydew
            link
            5
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Sync. Used it with reddit for so long it felt right. It’s a paid feature. But to me worth it. The person who created sync has been at it for a long time and I don’t mind supporting their work.

            • RubberDuck
              link
              fedilink
              22 months ago

              Sync was one of the reddit apps i had purchased.i personally preferred RiF… but supporting devs is good practice. I’ll check out sync for Lemmy again. A year ago I did not really like it… but it was very new then.

              • @Zipitydew
                link
                42 months ago

                It was rough at first. I tried Voyager and something else. Can’t recall now. But after 4ish months Sync had a few major updates land and went back to being my preferred option.

      • ArxCyberwolf
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        Don’t worry, they’re still going and just as exhausting as ever. Only reason I keep them unblocked is so I can read the replies destroying whatever bad-faith arguments they make because it’s entertaining.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    232 months ago

    Fuck all imperialist and hierarchical power structures. Fuck colonialism and fuck the police. Fuck fascists and the libs that enable them.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      Having worked in some non-hierarchical non-profits and teams, sometimes you want an head chef to make a call when there are too many cooks in the kitchen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 months ago

        Yes, but not hierarchy for hierarchies sake. Organization via consent is fine and encouraged. The problem is when it’s done by force in an attempt to justify the hierarchy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 months ago

        You are correct. “Unjust hierarchies” is probably the term I should have used. Some hierchical structures are going to be necessary in certain settings. What’s important is that they’re non-exploitative and entered into with real consent from all parties.

      • Zos_Kia
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Hierarchy by legitimacy is indeed a tough nut to crack. It works well when the organisation has a simple, measurable performance indicator, and when its micro economics are simple. Make widgets, sell widgets is a great model for this kind of structure but yeah, non profits are notoriously difficult to self govern.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 months ago

    My favorite part is the ‘moderates’ who insist they aren’t tankies/conservatives yet spend all their time playing apologist for the same.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 months ago

    If you are tired of tankies, just stop talking about them. They are NOT representative of the actual communists (at least worldwide). And by communism, I’m talking about the real one, the one which its final objective is a stateless and classless society.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -52 months ago

    It’s almost like “left” and “right” are bullshit alignments, and instead we have a wide array of stances on different issues; in this case on the tolerance of personal freedom and expression.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      Left and right can be useful, but it’s only a single data point. If you get all of your political beliefs from a single data point then you’re an idiot. As with everything, there is more nuance than that. It’s not useless. It just isn’t that encompassing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -182 months ago

    Leftists are so committed to destroying each other they’ll reinvent horseshoe theory.

    If the fascists take over, some of y’all will be strangling each other on the gallows.

    • rivvvver
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      yeee not quite horseshoe theory tho, is it?

      after all, the meme is just pointing out that both conservatives and tankies are pro-authority. said nothing about left and right

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s all they have! How dare you take their only argument from them! /s

        You are 100% right though. It’s a ham fisted deflection technique. I will defend them from people outright calling them fascists. Because there is a difference. But they are both authoritarian and in the end do a lot of the same things. Which should be discouraged no matter their intentions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 months ago

      Yep everyone that disagrees with you is just a liberal. It couldn’t be that many different ideologies disagree with you.

      Even if you still somehow mistakenly think that Marxist leninism is a valid and worthwhile ideology to pursue. After it’s been disproven so many ways. (As liberalism also has) Feeling the need to defend those who lack even more critical thinking skills like tankies. Will always make people still think less of you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      Staliboo fascists and appropriating aesthetic from actual leftists to pretend they aren’t just fascists who swap “the nation” for “the working class” in their rhetoric.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 months ago

        Slim difference, though it is a difference. And they aren’t fascists. We have a word that accurately describes both though. Authoritarian. And yes, it doesn’t matter where you derive your “authority” from. Authoritarianism is always wrong.