• Chetzemoka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Says the person who’s never heard their own right to exist or the rights of their loved ones called into question publicly.

    You don’t have the right to “debate” other people’s equal rights.

    • 10A@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except really, nobody’s ever debating anyone’s right to exist. That’s absurd.

      Consider this: If a mass murderer was captured and imprisoned, he could claim that the justice system opposes his right to exist. The trouble with that is he’d be completely incorrect. The justice system opposes his behavior of murder. No matter how much he believes his very existence is inextricably bound to his behavior of murder, the reality is he murders by choice, and it is that intentional action which the justice system opposes.

        • 10A@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, and I could have chosen any other action, but I chose murder because it’s not contentious to express a disapproval of it.

          • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did it ever occur to you that it’s “contentious” to express “disapproval” of trans people existing because…there’s nothing WRONG with trans people existing?

            • 10A@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hmm, sounds like you missed my entire point. Nobody objects to any people existing. Some people object to particular behaviors.