We’re preparing to read Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth for August but no time to start reading like the present. I found some generic book club questions from the ALA website which I pasted below. Please post any additional questions you have or objectives ahead of reading so that we can look back after reading and reflect on our presumptions and questions towards the end of the month. You don’t need to answer all of these questions word for word, just a guideline of things to post about in the coming weeks.

https://ia601708.us.archive.org/3/items/the-wretched-of-the-earth/The Wretched Of The Earth.pdf

Thanks for joining!

  1. If your book is a cultural portrait --of life in another country, or different region of your own country–start with these questions first:
  • What does the author celebrate or criticize in the culture? Consider family traditions, economic and political structures, the arts, language, food, religious beliefs.
  • Does the author wish to preserve or reform the culture? If reform, what and how? Either way—by instigating change or by maintaining the status quo—what would be gained or what would be at risk?
  • How does the culture differ from yours? What was most surprising, intriguing, difficult to understand? After reading the book, have you gained a new perspective—or did the book affirm your prior views?

  1. Does the book offer a central idea or premise? What are the problems or issues raised? Are they personal, spiritual, societal, global, political, economic, medical, scentific?

  2. Do the issues affect your life? How so—directly, on a daily basis, or more generally? Now or sometime in the future?

  3. What evidence does the author give to support the book’s ideas? Does he/she use personal observations and assessments? Facts? Statistics? Opinions? Historical documents? Scientific research? Quotations from authorities?

  4. Is the evidence convincing? Is it relevant or logical? Does it come from authoritative sources? (Is the author an authority?) Is the evidence speculative…how speculative?

  5. Some authors make assertions, only to walk away from them—without offering explanations. It’s maddening. Does the author use such unsupported claims?

  6. What kind of language does the author use? Is it objective and dispassionate? Or passionate and earnest? Is it polemical, inflammatory, sarcastic? Does the language help or undercut the author’s premise?

  7. Does the author—or can you—draw implications for the future? Are there long- or short-term consequences to the problems or issues raised in the book? If so, are they positive or negative? Affirming or frightening?

  8. Does the author—or can you—offer solutions to the problems or issues raised in the book? Who would implement those solutions? How probable is success?

  9. Does the author make a call to action to readers—individually or collectively? Is that call realistic? Idealistic?Achievable? Would readers be able to affect the desired outcome?

  10. Are the book’s issues controversial? How so? And who is aligned on which sides of the issues? Where do you fall in that line-up?

  11. Can you point to specific passages that struck you personally—as interesting, profound, silly or shallow, incomprehensible, illuminating?

  12. Did you learn something new reading this book? Did it broaden your perspective about a difficult personal issue? Or a societal issue? About another culture in another country… or about an ethnic / regional culture in your own country?