• fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    And the odds of any of that actually happening? How exactly are you going to regulate the growth of industries internationally in a way that doesn’t just end up offshoring the pollution to poor countries like it already has been for centuries?

    Dudes right, we need a dues ex machina to save us. We won’t make meaningful changes until it’s profitable to do so. So expect to see a lot of companies transition into cooling and environmental control. Because they won’t address the core problem, just sell you bandaids for the symptoms. The next advancement won’t be “less emissions”, it’ll be “this new coolant cools 35% better”.

    Look at heat pumps. Its literally just an AC unit that can swap the hot and cold side with a valve. It’s nothing new. But it’s the new “miracle cure” to all your heating and cooling needs. Just run your electricity that most likely comes from a coal power plant and smugly think about how you personally aren’t using gas to do it!

    We won’t fix it ourselves without major intervention.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Realistically, you couple domestic regulation with a carbon tariff, assessing incoming goods a fee based on differential pollution in their country of origin.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ok. You did that. China is still selling to other countries and polluting all over the place.

        Now what?

        Somalia is still burning our recycling. What about that?

        For every hole you plug, there are 10 more. But sure, we can call agree on this one thing even though the entire history of humanity has basically been “I disagree, let’s fight a war over it”.