• Beaver@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m down for proportional representation (PR) for voting in elections, with each voter having a single transferable vote (STV).

      • threelonmusketeers
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are many voting systems. PR is nice, but almost any of them would be better than FPTP.

        • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, honestly it’s just a question of whichever is easiest to enstate. They all allow for 3rd parties which is the main thing here – breaking the duopoly on power.

        • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Exactly, seriously just give me anything.

          Stv works in Australia + Malta and Alberta used it until the 50s, mmpr in New Zealand and Welsh + Scottish parliament. Australia also has instant runoff for the lower chamber so like we don’t have to use one form everywhere, use what makes sense. I’m pointing out commonwealth nations as we generally all have some form of Westminster parliament, but there’s other examples too, Germany uses mmpr afaik

          • killingspark@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Germany has a better way of representing the people but it also has its problems. We have a comically big parliament because of the way our system works

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes it is, further our current premier made it illegal for municipalities to use other voting systems because he doesn’t want people to understand them (London was going to use ranked iirc)

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why would the political leadership change an election system in a way that would hurt their odds of winning reelection?

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          He’s provincial not municipal

          The system was going to be for council/mayor and he made it so they don’t have authority to change their own systems

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Choose one:

      • [ ] Hard Right Financial Elites
      • [ ] Slightly Less Right Financial Elites
      • [ ] Slightly Left Financial Elites
  • Lucidlethargy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s even worse for Americans… Most of us DO vote against our own conservative party (as a unified, majority group), and yet we still deal with them running our government.

    I understand that a lot of our bullshit bleeds into Canada these days as well… We’re sorry our worst are doing that. We don’t send the best ideas or people up there, clearly. Just a bunch of racist, xenophobic, bad hombres.